Australian Voice Portraits
I recently became aware of a project by QUT academic Dr Robert Davidson, in which he takes recordings of short speeches of notable figures and distils the unintended “melodies” that come with the rhythm and intonation of the presentation, and then sets the speech to music performed by his five-piece ensemble, Topology. He calls this project Australian Voice Portraits, and says it is “an attempt to find some distinctive Australian music”.
This seems to be a follow up to a similar project that involved Topology and jazz ensemble, Loops:
We wanted to hear Churchill, Hitler, Einstein, Mao, Diana, Gandhi, Bush (and many others) singing, but without using any electronic trickery to do so. It has been a constant source of surprise and delight to find that, if one looks carefully, clear patterns emerge—including pulse and tonality—in every speech. Each speaker uses idiosyncratic melodic phrases, scales and rhythms. All one has to do is find these patterns and emphasise them with appropriate accompaniment—the motivic and harmonic unity composers are always striving for is already there, built in to the speech.
The links between a culture’s music and speech styles become very obvious when one works in this way. Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech slides so naturally into a gospel style. Malcolm X speaks how John Coltrane plays. Winston Churchill’s lilting rhythms would not be out of place in “Teddy Bear’s Picnic”. And when Bill Clinton lies about Monica Lewinsky, it fits effortlessly with his favourite Fleetwood Mac song.
From Sound and Fury by Robert Davidson.
The resulting work was called Airwaves: 100 Years of Radio (released either in 2001, 2005, or 2006, depending on which website you read). Davidson’s collaborator Jonathan Dimond describes the music as:
a new technique using characteristic intonation patterns of a person’s speech to make melody. The band plays music designed to emphasise this melody, so that when Bill Clinton talks about “that woman”, it sounds like he’s singing. The result is a new kind of opera.
See Dimond’s website here.
This is an intriguing idea that sounds slightly bizarre when described like this, so I would urge you to go to the Topology website and listen to some of the samples—maybe even buy it (no, I’m not getting commission).
My personal favourite: Martin Luther King.
Your Comments
Robert Davidson writes:
Thanks for the kind words and attention, John.
Posted: 7 10 2008 - 12:56 | Permanent link to this comment
Matthew Smith writes:
Wow! I’ll never be able to listen to a speech the same way again.
Posted: 13 10 2008 - 13:47 | Permanent link to this comment
dogpossum writes:
I remember reading somewhere (can’t remember where, sorry) that vernacular (or ‘folk’) music reflects the speech of its originating community. This is interesting for me in terms of jazz. So early, 1920s black American jazz ‘sounds like’ 1920s black American speech. Or, more specifically, a particular musician’s (or group’s) music will reflect their speech, in terms of inflection, pauses, etc etc.
I like this idea because it then suggests that the dances that accompanied these songs would (because dance is music made flesh) also reflect localised speaking patterns. I’m all up on the idea of dance-as-discourse, so you can see how I find this idea quite sweet.
But it gets more interesting when you think about covers and ‘white’ versions of ‘black’ jazz (and this is very important in light of the early days of the American recording industry). For me, I wonder whether I will ever find early Australian jazz that is as ‘good’ as work by the hot* black bands I really like.
It’s also very interesting when you think about blues music in an Australian context. Jimmy Little has done a version of a blues classic discussing slavery which is interesting not only in terms of a wider political and social context, but also in terms of specific vocal and musical structures.
… and this is where I could go on and on about my time with some indigenous choreographers and the Bangarra boys’ response to watching clips of 1940s lindy hop. Resonance, much?
Sorry this comment is so crapply written: I’m a bit distracted but wanted to chime in…
*hot as in musical style, not value/excellentness
Posted: 31 10 2008 - 12:53 | Permanent link to this comment