View from the Grassy Knoll

Posted Wednesday November 26, 2008 by John Gunders in |

I’m not normally prone to conspiracy theories, but I just can’t help but imagine that there was once a conversation on the upper floors of a certain building in George Street that went something like this:

“Anna, we’re screwed: we’ve tried everything, and we just can’t find a way to convince the public that recycled drinking water is the go.”

“Wait a minute! Let’s pretend we are going to build a dam in an important, environmentally sensitive beauty-spot. We’ll push on despite the community outrage, the blatant inappropriateness of the location, and clear illogic of the project. Then, just as it seems the dam will go ahead—we might even schedule a little preliminary bulldozing to lend it credibility—we’ll cave in on environmental concerns. The communities and lobbyists will be so relieved that they won’t even notice when the recycled water starts pouring into Wivenhoe Dam.”

“Anna, you’re a genius! I guess that’s why Pete left you in charge!”

OK, probably not.

But I can’t help but feel that the unexpected back down on the Traveston Dam project and the introduction of recycled water into Wivenhoe are somehow linked. Maybe the government felt it couldn’t sustain two highly unpopular projects; maybe Bligh realised that Federal approval would not be forthcoming; maybe they were finally convinced that it was a ludicrous project; perhaps it will be back on the agenda shortly after the next election. But the Premier’s linking of the two issues in the press conference suggests that it’s not just my imagination.

Anyway, congratulations to the various Mary Valley environmental groups who lobbied tirelessly over this issue. The project is “postponed” rather than cancelled, but it seems to me that the major battle is over.

On a related note, I should point out that I am fully supportive of the plan to pump recycled water into Wivenhoe. I maintain that most of the objections are based on impressions and emotion, rather than the science. I don’t claim to be a scientist, but the purification process is rigorous, and modern governments are well aware of the danger of litigation if they screw something like this up. I am also aware that the Wivenhoe Dam catchments areas are largely pastoral and the dam itself is an open lake: fish swim in it; birds fly over it; cows wade in the tributary creeks; feral pigs dig in its banks; fertilizers and pesticides leach into it. I don’t think I am being gullible if I accept the Queensland Water Commission’s claim that the water being pumped into the dam will be cleaner than the water already there.

Your Comments

  1. Wendy writes:

    I just thought that maybe they thought noone would notice the recycled water about turn if it was announced on the same day as the Traveston turnaround – it being the bigger, longer running story. Is that conspiracist of me?

    Posted: 26 11 2008 - 11:05 | Permanent link to this comment

  2. Sam writes:

    Wivenhoe is currently at 31.10% of capacity and if it reaches full capacity then it is capable of taking an additional flood storage of more than 100% normal capacity if it rains heaps.

    People who say the we don’t need recycled water because it has started raining again don’t know what they are talking about.

    Posted: 26 11 2008 - 16:16 | Permanent link to this comment

  3. Jonathon writes:

    [updated]

    I worked on the water recylcing plant, yes I do have quite a lot of faith in the technology.

    The current backflip on recycling is reminiscnet of “meta-dioxin” on Yes Minister. It’s “inert”… what does that mean? It’s not …“ert”.

    To not use the recycled water is a waste of not just the $2.2B on western corridor but also another major lynchpin in the watergrid is the ability to pump from Hinze Dam up to Wivenhoe, which uses the same pipeline.

    Do people realise just how much has been spent? $10B is a lot of money for water – over 2M residents of SEQ that is $5k each. Your taxes and water rates will fund this until it is sold off to some capitalist bastard who will demand Macquarie-Bank type returns.

    Anna is woossing out and listening to polls instead of selling the science. At least John Howard went down fighting for what he really thought!

    [posted by the editors due to a spam-filtering problem]

    Posted: 27 11 2008 - 09:17 | Permanent link to this comment

Comment entry (Textile is enabled)